Questo sito utilizza cookies tecnici (necessari) e analitici.
Proseguendo nella navigazione accetti l'utilizzo dei cookie.

Il discorso della presidente Kersti Kaljulaid in occasione della celebrazione della Festa Nazionale del 24.02.2017

kersti kaljulaid speech

Foto from Postimees, by Liis Treimann.

“…the land is thawing, the grass is sprouting, the trees are budding and in the shadow of a leaf, a bird is again singing its eternal spring song. It is the sentimental nightingale or the romantic bluebird s i u r u – what difference does it make! The main thing is it is proclaiming new life with new buds, blossoms and grain.”

Good Estonian people!
Dear guests!

The romantic who wrote this was Tuglas. A hundred years ago. Estonia would soon become an independent state and a hope existed that – year after year –things would slowly improve for future generations.

And that’s what has happened. We have our own state, which will never stand alone again. Our partners and allies are with us unconditionally. They respect our language and our culture, our traditions and wishes, just as we have respected them.

And in today’s world such allies are extremely important. The world may not be totally out of joint, but we see that things, which have been self-evident for decades, may no longer be absolute.

This world requires countries like Estonia be especially vigilant. It requires the resolute observation of the values that form the basis of society, and especially international law. It requires that we act responsibly on the international stage and in its corridors. I stress this today when, in only 127 days and a little more than seven hours, Estonia will assume the Presidency of the Council of the European Union.

Otto von Bismarck said, “No loss in domestic policy is forever. But in foreign policy there are times and opportunities that will never return.” For a small country, there is no better formula for survival. No matter what we do, we must always consider, or even more, prioritise our foreign policy interests, our international position.

During the last quarter century, our foreign and security policy has been successful. Our politicians have accepted international responsibilities and fulfilled them, sometimes at the cost of domestic popularity. Today we see how important this has been. We are being assured that, in turbulent times, we will not be abandoned.

I thank the governments of Estonia for having made the right decisions in complicated times.

In 25 years, we have created our dream Estonia. But this will not suffice for the future. We must now create our children’s and grandchildren’s dream Estonia. Our country is very different from others, clearly more creative and flexible. I see many opportunities for progress based on what has already been achieved.

The independent state of Estonia can only exist permanently in a space of democratic values. A small state cannot function in a geopolitically tense place such as ours if it is internally undemocratic.

An important role in democratic values is played by human rights, which all people are entitled to simply because they are born human. In addition, there are the values that have been agreed upon in our Constitution, in order to preserve the Estonian language and culture, because otherwise, there would be no point to an independent Republic of Estonia.

Language and the arts create the cultural space. By adding customs and traditions, we get a behavioural space that is inherent to us. We get a cohesive environment, and we have the right to demand that anyone who comes here for a longer period, or for good, recognises this. Anyone who appreciates our language, customs and values can be an Estonian. Thus, they, as well as we, can consider them Estonian.

We can write laws about how to become an Estonian citizen, but not on how to become a part of the Estonian nation. If we would attempt that, we would turn into a totalitarian society, and destroy our freedoms in the name of preserving our conduct.

We cannot prohibit everything that we don’t wish to see in our behavioural space; because, in the end, we would also destroy our own freedom. We cannot make Estonians of everyone who wants to live here. This should not be our goal. In this way we would destroy our Estonian nature.

At the same time, our functional platform is an Estonian platform. We have one official language. Speaking the official language at home or with one’s friends is not required. But the readiness to communicate in other languages, including the state’s readiness to respect the human rights of local residents or visitors who do speak Estonian, should never be seen a signal that we are ready to reduce the role of the Estonian language as the official language.

Even more – the fact that the Estonian language and culture is protected by our constitution does not mean that the Estonian language is actually protected. A language cannot be protected by commands and prohibitions. A language is only protected when it is successfully taught to the local people who do not know the language. And the more it is taught to greater numbers of people, the better.

I understand that most Estonians want to hold onto their behavioural space more jealously than many other West-European countries. The majority of us are not ready to live in a multicultural society, where Estonian conduct would not be more important that of others.

The countries, which we believe are losing their identity to newcomers, have been more successful than we have in creating a uniform linguistic space, even when they have been less committed to protecting their behavioural space. Integration into the linguistic environment starts in kindergarten and pre-school, through natural communications between adults and children, not through language instruction.

The customs of the other ethnic groups who live here do not different very much from ours. There are peoples in the world whose understanding of society is radically different than ours. This does not mean that there is no place for them in Estonia, be they war refugees or labour migrants. However, we must be able to formulate what we expect of them in order to function together in Estonian society.

The preservation of the behavioural space cannot be limited to teaching people the language as well as a respect for the freedoms of our society, and not to restrict these freedoms at one’s own initiative. This is simply the precondition, the minimum. Our behavioural space is ensured by our constant readiness to remember the values that are important to us. A role in the protection of our behavioural space must also be played by the respect we show to the customs of others, but only if they do not start to infringe on our behavioural space.

Describing the behavioural space is complicated; after all, we are not homogeneous robots attending to Estonian affairs. We also have different habits, different expectations of life, and different worldviews. But since we are apparently not ready for a multicultural society, we must be able to formulate our own society, Estonia’s society. We must be able to describe it as well as consistently and deftly teach it.

Ladies and gentlemen!

Conservative in our habits, we are nevertheless one of the most innovative as a society. The promoters of Estonian life have a good understanding of the future.

We currently see that the expectations of our young people differ fundamentally from even those who are middle-aged. Young people do not know the meaning of structural unemployment or retraining. They switch employers, their own role in the labour market and fields of activity naturally and without hesitation. As their incomes increase, they prefer to reduce their working hours rather than save for the future. They live in the here and now. Traditional jobs are also changing – ever fewer people have to spend a certain number of hours at a definite location.

The situation seems strange. The new generations do not want to work for 30 years straight and then retire. They study, work, travel and have children in a rhythm that suits them. And this lifestyle does not seem to have been rebuked. However, the pension and health insurance models of no developed country can accommodate this rhythm. Today, young people are not interested in this; they just don’t contribute, because the risk of needing help is small or somewhere in the distant future.

We have to make the provision of our social support more flexible. We must consider the different kind of lives that our young people lead. The good news is that this does not require large investments. We must just pay more attention to these changes in a timely manner and have the will to see the value and not the problems therein.

Society is like a river, the flow rate of which is determined by the will of its members, the environment around the streambed, and the opportunities of history. Our history is movement – departure and arrival. Compared to the other countries of the world, we are much better prepared for this era, because we have a homeland that is available on the web, which is a fulcrum for its citizens and its e-residents.

Every person needs a country that provides the opportunity of existing as a member of the society. The more people function in different countries, the less the contract between people and states is related to a geographical location.

We must provide our travelling citizens a permanent relationship with the state; the opportunity to pay taxes and participate in the society’s security network regardless of their location on the globe. Those who are freely travelling the world today must be recognised by our society. If we are able to provide our e-residents with the same, in ten years, we will definitely be one of the most successful countries in the world.

The common trait of labour migrants is that they are able-bodied, smart and can contribute to society. Let them contribute to our society!

If we recognise our young people’s urge to fly, but also create a landing area that is always open where they can be full-fledged members of our society, this will also attract other entrepreneurial and educated people from the world. Estonia can offer a portable environment with limited bureaucracy.

The portable state not only helps the IT and startup economies, but also the traditional players. The English entrepreneur who is afraid of Brexit can find shelter from the storm here. For instance, if could convince the world’s shipowners to conduct all their business electronically with their flag state, our flag could fly on many ships. It is easy for Estonia to provide this based on what already exists.

The state has already created the foundation. If entrepreneurs build a superstructure for e-residents that is as awesome as the one they have built for e-Estonians, then Estonia will be among the winners of this century.

We have only five years to accomplish this, because in that time, our own exporting IT companies will probably help some other countries catch up. We must not delay. Already 1% of our companies are owned by e-residents. Currently we can offer them limited bureaucracy, but few other services. The number of additional services must increase extremely fast and become unlimited. The key is in the hands of the entrepreneurs who understand the expectations of the e-residents and address them. In this process, the role of state, as always, will be, to time and again, quickly eliminate any bureaucratic obstacles without endangering the reliability of the system.

Dear listeners!

We must also speak about the state of the Estonian spirit. Together we must strive to reduce the iniquity in Estonia.

Today is a state holiday. The police know that the most fights between people occur during holidays. And it often happens in the place that should be the safest – at home. This is true of Christmas, and St. John’s Day. And it is also true today, on Independence Day.

The cycle of violence repeats itself from generation to generation, and it hard to break the cycle without the public attention that could cause a significant shift in attitudes. It is no enough to delegate this problem to the police and the social workers.

When was the last time you heard a pre-election political discussion, for example, about how a respected candidate would help to root out violence? Demand such a discussion. Don’t elect anyone who is only able to come up with a tasteless joke about the topic of domestic violence. Don’t laugh and don’t elect.

For myself, I promise not to stop talking about this before I feel that attitudes are changing. If people are protected in their homes, we are also better protected from road rage, random fights and unwarranted derision in the public space.

I hope that five years from now ignoring such incidents will no longer be thinkable. Undoubtedly, we also need investments to battle violence – primarily to provide the victims an opportunity for a new life, regardless of the nature of the violence and the age of the victim. However, such investments must come from public procurement.

A culture of apathy will not create such procurement. It’s the job of all of us to promote a culture of noticing. For a start, let’s take a look at ourselves. On the web you will find the Action Meter, where starting today ideas will be collected for achieving a violence-free Estonia.

Dear friends!

We have not achieved everything that we have dreamed of. We don’t have a classical welfare state, like those we saw in the wealthy democracies 25 years ago, and set as examples for ourselves.

Actually no country has been able afford such a state – not economically, or from the viewpoint of the society’s health. A welfare state absolved the members of society from the requirement to worry about themselves or their community. Such a society loses the ability to resist the changes in the surrounding environment, because discussions about these changes are not conducted at the grassroots level.

The international situation today is hard to bear. The world order and societal organisation that we joined as an independent state 25 years ago could not even become a global benefit before people started to have doubts about it.

The portrayal of the democratic world order did not sufficiently emphasise human rights and freedoms, equal opportunities and the low level of corruption. Worded in this way, the global democratic world order is feasible for humankind.

The democratic world order has been too often described as a comfortable consumer culture. This could never be a global benefit, because, considering our current level of technological development, our planet’s resources would not have sufficed for this. This collective misunderstanding and its acknowledgement is what has currently destabilised the developed world.

What can we do differently to achieve the wellbeing we dream of? We deserve wellbeing, but we also want to make it available to our children and their children.

Estonia has never been able to allow a society to exist that does not think about the future. Now, this way of thinking has become our advantage. We are used to worrying about our families, our villages, our state and the world.

We all belong to several communities – to families and to communities related to our work, hobbies and habitat. Each of us is divided into fragments, in order to form a new whole comprised of other people’s fragments. Our society is like a basket of twigs, all intertwined. Our flexibility helps to better prepare us for the sensible organisation of community life in the 21st century.

Good people!

Now, when the borders of rural municipalities are farther apart and there are fewer seats of local government, the system for noticing common needs and answering them must be fundamentally changed. The running of the country must be updated at the institutional level. By optimisation, not addition. We call this state reform.

However, a greater change that will help us arrive at a cohesive and caring society, will take place if we all participate. It’s a good thing that I don’t have to call for the updating of local services today. The work is already underway.

Increasingly, an immediate perception, a wish to help and the capability of the state and local governments to help are coinciding. Community activities have spread according to the model of a traditional welfare state, as public, or alternative and expensive private services, in the available sectors, for example, in the social sector. These are now becoming community services. We have discovered our roots, because communal activities also played a significant role in the Republic of Estonia before World War II.

Many of you are helping to build community services in Estonia. We have met with you. We have also met with those of you that finance these community services as leaders in your cities and rural municipalities. And we have discussed ways to proceed so that these community services will help to build the society and not burden the people capable of leadership.

And it is here that we have a long way to go if we are to make sure that what we are seeing now will not diminish due to fatigue. It is also important to develop a financing model that is simple and transparent; in order to make sure that community services do not drown in bureaucracy; that doubts do not develop about the rationality behind the use of tax revenues, and accusations of corruption are not made.

Joint state-supported action should be seen as the feasible model for local governance in the 21st century. As one example of many, I would like to highlight the undertakings of some women from Viljandi who are helping other more elderly women with limited means. Several of the local governments support this voluntary service. The women’s initiative is spreading from one rural municipality to another. In this way, a seamless society can be created, with the community providing support and assistance, and the local government helping cover the costs.

Local government elections are coming up. Ask the candidates whether they are ready to support your endeavours if you have the will to act? Or are they wedded to outdated management models, where once elected, the leaders decide what is good for the people, and then praise their own decisions in media established with your money?

Are they ready to enter into an ongoing discussion about what should be done in your local area? Would they allow you to develop the kind of village or city that you think is needed? And if they would, show them that you appreciate that. Elect them!

And what’s more, if the state wants the local governments to be the true keepers and leaders of the community, it should not burden them with the activities that can be effectively organised centrally in a small country. Now that the local municipalities are larger, it is tempting to shift responsibility, for instance, for secondary education and primary medical care onto them.

This should not be done. The availability of good education and health care in every corner of Estonia is one of the main tasks of the Estonian state. The role of the local governments must be supportive, but they must not be made accountable. Rather, we should think about whether the state’s responsibility for elementary and basic education should not be clarified in order to maintain one of our greatest common values – comprehensive schooling.

If something must be the same throughout the country, it is the responsibility of the state. Local governments are responsible for everything that is local in nature and needs to be resolved, here and now, if it is needed by only one person.

Everybody can contribute these resources that they have on hand to the community and our communal life – time and skills, money or attention. I want to thank everyone who is helping to build a new, seamless Estonian society to the best of your ability!

Dear listeners!

In a community-based society it is simple to the common denominator, and not to differ. Balancing life and work; the cooperation between the community and the state; and contributing to Estonian society while conquering the world is possible. A technological breakthrough, which the brightest people in the world would have searched for long ago, is not required. The simple truth is that the faster the world changes, the more advantages the small and flexible will gain.

The poet Ernst Enno wrote the following on 27 June 1918:

“That which was is gone

That which is coming is still before us.”

We had gotten our own state, along with the responsibility for preserving it.

Many foreign powers and battlefronts had passed over Estonia. And yet, statehood rooted itself firmly; and these roots withstood all the trials of the 20th century even when the tree could not sprout the buds and the nightingale could not sing the songs that we longed for.

How much has been given to those of our era!

Let’s be thankful.

Let’s take care of each other.

And let’s take care of Estonia!

Happy Independence Day!